VS

Home > Care Homes UK > Dunsland - Norwich

Dunsland - Norwich

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Care Homes UK
 Compare
Dunsland - Norwich VS
All other Care Homes UK
General
Street Address 23-25 Paston Road, Mundesley, Suffolk, Nr11 8bn 
Local Authority / Social Services Norfolk County Council  vs 2.7% Care Homes UK have Norfolk County Council
Locality Norwich  vs 1.2% Care Homes UK have Norwich
Local Authority Area Norfolk 
Single Rooms
12  (12.84 lower than average)
vs
24.84

Rooms with ensuite WC
(19.21 lower than average)
vs
22.21

Shared Rooms
(2.41 lower than average)
vs
3.41

Admission Information 30+ Years Old. 
Facilities & Services Independent Living Training
Own Gp If Required
Close To Local Shops
Near Public Transport
Minibus Or Other Transport
Gardens For Residents
Television Point In Own Room 

Specialisms/services Learning Disabilities 
Last Inspection Date 16 March 2012, 12 December 2011 
Last Report Date 12 April 2012, 17 January 2012 
Organisation Cephas Care Limited  vs 0% Care Homes UK have Cephas Care Limited
website dunsland Website 
Contact details
Phone (01263) 720618  
Standard
Standard 1 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 2 Overall: Improvements Required 
Standard 3 Overall: Improvements Required 
Standard 4 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 5 Overall: Improvements Required 
# of standards being met
(2.84 lower than average)
vs
4.84

# of standards need improvement
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Outcome
outcome 1 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 2 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 4 Improvements Required 
outcome 5 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 6 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 7 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 8 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 9 Improvements Required 
outcome 10 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 11 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 12 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 13 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 14 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 16 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 17 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 21 Improvements Required 
# of outcomes being met
13  (2.66 lower than average)
vs
15.66

# of outcomes need improvement
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
2.17



Scroll To Top

saved