VS

Home > Care Homes UK > Chataway Nursing Home - Manchester

Chataway Nursing Home - Manchester

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Care Homes UK
 Compare
Chataway Nursing Home - Manchester VS
All other Care Homes UK
General
Street Address 19-21 Chataway Road, Crumpsall, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M8 5uu 
Local Authority / Social Services Manchester City Council  vs 0.6% Care Homes UK have Manchester City Council
Locality Manchester  vs 1.1% Care Homes UK have Manchester
Local Authority Area Manchester 
Single Rooms
12  (12.84 lower than average)
vs
24.84

Shared Rooms
(3.59 higher than average)
vs
3.41

Facilities & Services Physiotherapy
Own Gp If Required
Own Furniture If Required
Pets By Arrangement
Close To Local Shops
Near Public Transport
Lift
Wheelchair Access
Gardens For Residents
Television Point In Own Room 

Specialisms/services Mental Health Conditions 
Last Inspection Date 6 January 2012 
Last Report Date 30 January 2012 
Organisation D R Price Associates Limited  vs 0% Care Homes UK have D R Price Associates Limited
Contact details
Phone (0161) 205 5546  
Standard
Standard 1 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 2 Overall: Improvements Required 
Standard 3 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 4 Overall: Improvements Required 
Standard 5 Overall: Improvements Required 
# of standards being met
(2.84 lower than average)
vs
4.84

# of standards need improvement
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Outcome
outcome 1 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 2 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 4 Improvements Required 
outcome 5 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 6 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 7 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 8 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 9 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 10 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 11 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 12 Improvements Required 
outcome 13 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 14 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 16 Improvements Required 
outcome 17 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 21 Meeting This Standard 
# of outcomes being met
13  (2.66 lower than average)
vs
15.66

# of outcomes need improvement
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
2.17



Scroll To Top

saved