VS

Home > Care Homes UK > Daken House - London

Daken House - London

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Care Homes UK
 Compare
Daken House - London VS
All other Care Homes UK
General
Street Address 240 Romford Road, Forest Gate 
Local Authority / Social Services London Borough Of Newham Council  vs 0.2% Care Homes UK have London Borough of Newham Council
Locality London  vs 3.9% Care Homes UK have London
Local Authority Area Newham 
Single Rooms
50  (25.16 higher than average)
vs
24.84

Rooms with ensuite WC
(13.21 lower than average)
vs
22.21

Facilities & Services Physiotherapy
Own Gp If Required
Own Furniture If Required
Close To Local Shops
Near Public Transport
Lift
Wheelchair Access
Gardens For Residents
Residents Kitchenette
Phone Point In Own Room/mobile
Television Point In Own Room 

Specialist Care Alzheimer's 
Languages Spoken (other than English) French, Tagalog, Gujarati, Hindi, Patua 
Specialisms/services Dementia
Diagnostic And/or Screening Services
Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs 

Last Inspection Date 13 June 2012 
Last Report Date 15 August 2012 
Contact details
Address 240 Romford Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9hz 
Phone (020) 8221 2444  
Standard
Standard 1 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 2 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 3 Overall: Improvements
required 

Standard 4 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 5 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
# of standards being met
(0.84 lower than average)
vs
4.84

Outcome
outcome 1 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 2 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 4 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 5 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 6 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 7 Improvements Required 
outcome 8 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 9 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 10 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 11 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 12 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 13 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 14 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 16 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 17 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 21 Meeting This Standard 
# of outcomes being met
15  (0.66 lower than average)
vs
15.66

# of outcomes need improvement
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
2.17



Scroll To Top

saved