Compare with other Care Homes UK
Compare
Compare
| Kings Lodge Centre for Complex Needs - Redhill | VS | All other Care Homes UK |
| General | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Street Address | Kings Cross Lane, South Nutfield, Redhill, Surrey, Rh1 5pa | ||||
| Local Authority / Social Services | Surrey County Council | vs | 3.1% Care Homes UK have Surrey County Council |
||
| Locality | Redhill | vs | 0.3% Care Homes UK have Redhill |
||
| Local Authority Area | Surrey | ||||
| Single Rooms |
38 (13.16 higher than average)
|
vs |
24.84
|
||
| Rooms with ensuite WC |
38 (15.79 higher than average)
|
vs |
22.21
|
||
| Admission Information | All Aspects Of Disability. | ||||
| Facilities & Services |
Palliative Care Day Care Respite Care Convalescent Care Physiotherapy Own Gp If Required Own Furniture If Required Pets By Arrangement Minibus Or Other Transport Lift Wheelchair Access Gardens For Residents Television Point In Own Room Residents Internet Access |
||||
| Specialist Care | Cancer Care, Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy, Head/brain Injury, Hearing Impairment, Huntington's Disease, Motor Neurone Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Muscular Dystrophy, Neuropathic, Parkinson's Disease, Speech Impairment, Spina Bifida & Hydrocephalus, Stroke, Visual Impairment | ||||
| Languages Spoken (other than English) | Tamil, Tagalog | ||||
| Specialisms/services |
Diagnostic And/or Screening Services Physical Disabilities Caring For Adults Under 65 Yrs Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs |
||||
| Last Inspection Date | 7 And 8 December 2010 | ||||
| Last Report Date | 8 March 2011 | ||||
| Organisation | Alum Care Limited | vs | 0% Care Homes UK have Alum Care Limited |
||
| website | kings Lodge Website | ||||
| Contact details | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phone | (01737) 822221 | ||||
| Standard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 2 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 3 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 4 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 5 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| # of standards being met |
2 (2.84 lower than average)
|
vs |
4.84
|
||
| # of standards need improvement |
3 (0.17 higher than average)
|
vs |
2.83
|
||
| Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| outcome 1 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 2 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 4 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 5 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 6 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 7 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 8 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 9 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 10 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 11 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 12 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 13 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 14 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 16 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 17 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 21 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of outcomes being met |
13 (2.66 lower than average)
|
vs |
15.66
|
||
| # of outcomes need improvement |
3 (0.83 higher than average)
|
vs |
2.17
|
||