Compare with other Care Homes UK
Compare
Compare
| Meadow Lodge Care Home - Birmingham | VS | All other Care Homes UK |
| General | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Street Address | 445-447 Hagley Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, B17 8bl | ||||
| Local Authority / Social Services | Birmingham City Council | vs | 2.2% Care Homes UK have Birmingham City Council |
||
| Locality | Birmingham | vs | 2.2% Care Homes UK have Birmingham |
||
| Local Authority Area | Birmingham | ||||
| Single Rooms |
14 (10.84 lower than average)
|
vs |
24.84
|
||
| Rooms with ensuite WC |
3 (19.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
22.21
|
||
| Shared Rooms |
4 (0.59 higher than average)
|
vs |
3.41
|
||
| Facilities & Services |
Respite Care Own Gp If Required Own Furniture If Required Close To Local Shops Near Public Transport Minibus Or Other Transport Stairlift Wheelchair Access Gardens For Residents Residents Kitchenette Television Point In Own Room |
||||
| Languages Spoken (other than English) | Punjabi, Tagalog | ||||
| Specialisms/services |
Dementia Caring For Adults Under 65 Yrs Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs |
||||
| Last Inspection Date | 10 July 2012, 15 June 2011, 13 January 2011 And 18 September 2012 | ||||
| Last Report Date | 23 August 2012, 4 November 2011, 20 May 2011 | ||||
| Organisation | Coseley Systems Limited | vs | 0% Care Homes UK have Coseley Systems Limited |
||
| website | meadow Lodge Care Home Website | ||||
| Contact details | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phone | (0121) 420 2004 | ||||
| Standard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 2 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 3 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 4 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 5 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| # of standards being met |
1 (3.84 lower than average)
|
vs |
4.84
|
||
| # of standards need improvement |
4 (1.17 higher than average)
|
vs |
2.83
|
||
| Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| outcome 1 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 2 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 4 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 5 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 6 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 7 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 8 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 9 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 10 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 11 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 12 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 13 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 14 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 16 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 17 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 21 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of outcomes being met |
10 (5.66 lower than average)
|
vs |
15.66
|
||
| # of outcomes need improvement |
6 (3.83 higher than average)
|
vs |
2.17
|
||