Compare with other Care Homes UK
Compare
Compare
| Red Rose Nursing Home - Newark | VS | All other Care Homes UK |
| General | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Street Address | 32 Brockton Avenue, Farndon, Newark, Nottinghamshire, Ng24 4th | ||||
| Local Authority / Social Services | Nottinghamshire County Council | vs | 1.9% Care Homes UK have Nottinghamshire County Council |
||
| Locality | Newark | vs | 0.2% Care Homes UK have Newark |
||
| Local Authority Area | Nottinghamshire | ||||
| Single Rooms |
44 (19.16 higher than average)
|
vs |
24.84
|
||
| Rooms with ensuite WC |
11 (11.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
22.21
|
||
| Shared Rooms |
2 (1.41 lower than average)
|
vs |
3.41
|
||
| Facilities & Services |
Palliative Care Day Care Respite Care Convalescent Care Separate Emi Unit Own Gp If Required Own Furniture If Required Smoking Not Permitted Close To Local Shops Near Public Transport Lift Wheelchair Access Gardens For Residents Phone Point In Own Room/mobile Television Point In Own Room Residents Internet Access |
||||
| Specialist Care | Bipolar/manic Depression, Cancer Care, Challenging Behaviour, Motor Neurone Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Stroke | ||||
| Specialisms/services |
Dementia Diagnostic And/or Screening Services Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs |
||||
| Last Inspection Date | 19 March 2012, 27 February 2012, 23 January 2012, 5 And 21 July 2011 | ||||
| Last Report Date | 18 April 2012, 16 April 2012, 28 March 2012, 7 October 2011 | ||||
| Organisation | Mr Roger Daniel | vs | 0% Care Homes UK have Mr Roger Daniel |
||
| website | red Rose Nursing Home Website | ||||
| Contact details | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phone | (01636) 673017 | ||||
| Standard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 2 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 3 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 4 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 5 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of standards being met |
4 (0.84 lower than average)
|
vs |
4.84
|
||
| # of standards need improvement |
1 (1.83 lower than average)
|
vs |
2.83
|
||
| Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| outcome 1 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 2 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 4 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 5 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 6 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 7 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 8 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 9 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 10 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 11 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 12 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 13 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 14 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 16 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 17 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 21 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 15 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of outcomes being met |
16 (0.34 higher than average)
|
vs |
15.66
|
||
| # of outcomes need improvement |
1 (1.17 lower than average)
|
vs |
2.17
|
||