VS

Home > Care Homes UK > Russley Lodge - Manchester

Russley Lodge - Manchester

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Care Homes UK
 Compare
Russley Lodge - Manchester VS
All other Care Homes UK
General
Street Address 276 Wilbraham Road, Chorlton, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M16 8wp 
Local Authority / Social Services Manchester City Council  vs 0.6% Care Homes UK have Manchester City Council
Locality Manchester  vs 1.1% Care Homes UK have Manchester
Local Authority Area Manchester 
Single Rooms
17  (7.84 lower than average)
vs
24.84

Facilities & Services Own Gp If Required
Own Furniture If Required
Pets By Arrangement
Smoking Not Permitted
Near Public Transport
Lift
Wheelchair Access
Gardens For Residents
Phone Point In Own Room/mobile
Television Point In Own Room 

Specialisms/services Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs 
Last Inspection Date 20 January 2012 
Last Report Date 14 February 2012 
Organisation Russley Care Homes Limited  vs 0% Care Homes UK have Russley Care Homes Limited
website russley Lodge Website 
Contact details
Phone (0161) 881 2989  
Standard
Standard 1 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 2 Overall: Improvements Required 
Standard 3 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 4 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
Standard 5 Overall: Meeting This Standard 
# of standards being met
(0.84 lower than average)
vs
4.84

# of standards need improvement
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Outcome
outcome 1 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 2 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 4 Improvements Required 
outcome 5 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 6 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 7 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 8 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 9 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 10 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 11 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 12 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 13 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 14 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 16 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 17 Meeting This Standard 
outcome 21 Meeting This Standard 
# of outcomes being met
15  (0.66 lower than average)
vs
15.66

# of outcomes need improvement
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
2.17



Scroll To Top

saved