Compare with other Care Homes UK
Compare
Compare
| Sue Ryder - The Chantry - Ipswich | VS | All other Care Homes UK |
| General | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Street Address | Chantry Park, Hadleigh Road, Ipswich, Suffolk, Ip2 0bp | ||||
| Local Authority / Social Services | Suffolk County Council | vs | 1.4% Care Homes UK have Suffolk County Council |
||
| Locality | Ipswich | vs | 0.4% Care Homes UK have Ipswich |
||
| Local Authority Area | Suffolk | ||||
| Single Rooms |
25 (0.16 higher than average)
|
vs |
24.84
|
||
| Rooms with ensuite WC |
2 (20.21 lower than average)
|
vs |
22.21
|
||
| Shared Rooms |
3 (0.41 lower than average)
|
vs |
3.41
|
||
| Facilities & Services |
Day Care Respite Care Physiotherapy Sheltered Housing Own Gp If Required Own Furniture If Required Pets By Arrangement Close To Local Shops Near Public Transport Minibus Or Other Transport Lift Wheelchair Access Gardens For Residents Bar/cafe On Premises Residents Kitchenette Phone Point In Own Room/mobile Television Point In Own Room Residents Internet Access |
||||
| Specialist Care | Cerebral Palsy, Challenging Behaviour, Epilepsy, Head/brain Injury, Huntington's Disease, Motor Neurone Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Spina Bifida & Hydrocephalus, Stroke | ||||
| Specialisms/services |
Dementia Diagnostic And/or Screening Services Physical Disabilities Sensory Impairments Caring For Adults Under 65 Yrs Caring For Adults Over 65 Yrs |
||||
| Last Inspection Date | 17 April 2012 | ||||
| Last Report Date | 31 May 2012 | ||||
| Organisation | Sue Ryder | vs | 0% Care Homes UK have Sue Ryder |
||
| website | sue Ryder - The Chantry Website | ||||
| Contact details | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phone | (01473) 295200 | ||||
| Standard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard 1 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 2 | Overall: Improvements Required | ||||
| Standard 3 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 4 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| Standard 5 | Overall: Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of standards being met |
4 (0.84 lower than average)
|
vs |
4.84
|
||
| # of standards need improvement |
1 (1.83 lower than average)
|
vs |
2.83
|
||
| Outcome | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| outcome 1 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 2 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 4 | Improvements Required | ||||
| outcome 5 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 6 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 7 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 8 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 9 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 10 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 11 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 12 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 13 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 14 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 16 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 17 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| outcome 21 | Meeting This Standard | ||||
| # of outcomes being met |
15 (0.66 lower than average)
|
vs |
15.66
|
||
| # of outcomes need improvement |
1 (1.17 lower than average)
|
vs |
2.17
|
||